JenRox wrote:

---

jamesuk2 wrote:

---

^ no I would say that in additon to OOS

The Cell was A,B,C & D - most definately
Angel Eyes was A,B,C & D

For me A,B,C is the most important like AUL is A,B,C.

I disagree. I don't think Angel Eyes was well received. I can't comment on The Cell because I was out of the country and computer/TV-less so I have no idea what happened.

^ sorry Heather none of my cirteria talk about the film doing great with the critics. They are all subjective to my opinion if you know what I mean.

I mean both AE & TC had IMO

A - Good Story/concept
B - Good direction & script
C - Jen was really good in them
D - They both had a good release in terms of financial success TC more so. eg they didnt have finance issues like BT & L&OIP & TG.


I thought regardless of any criticsm AE got I thought the crtics said Jen performed well in it??

nmou81 wrote:

---

^ the visual and the direction yeah but not the script same goes for Angel eyes. Lol i agree Okeyok about Enough, i can't stand that movie.

dont want to seem picky but really what was wrong with TC's script? IMO there where no signifcant problems do you mean to get really down to the exact dialogue in certain scenes??

I agree that reallty her worst where Enough & Gigli.

Anyway I suppose we better stay on topic. I wonder if there will be any heist element to TG. Its may be fun to see for once Jen being the criminal rather than the Cop.

nmou81 wrote:

---

^ i just though that the story was not complex enough compared to his visual i don't you you get what mean ??

Ok I see what you mean. I thought you meant problems with particular scenes or the actual words/ lines that Jen's or other character said.

What do you guys think of my opening for TG.


Movie scenes in Boston City:-

Shots of the city

Scene 1: (DAY) The movie starts off with Jen robbing a bank similar to George in OOS, but Jen gets away with it. something clever but not violent (jen looks like she does in the MHF video with bobbed hair and wearing sunglasses)

Scene 2: she is hurrying away from the scene looks towards the bank and bumps into a guy and drops her phone which is ringing.

They look at each other and he hands it back to her. They continue in their opposite directions. She answers her phone: Its a man he asks her if the hesit/robbery went well. she says she cant speak right now and has to keep going and continues walking.

Scene 3: She goes into a shop and puts a code into a door like the MHF video. She takes off her disguise like in the MHF video. She goes down stairs and meets a guy (the one on the telephone) they kiss each other (its her boyfriend) He says she was delayed thought something went wrong thats why he rung. She laughs and hands over the bag and says it was successful. He says he has to leave with it and exits.

Scene 4: Cuts back to guy she bumped into on the street. He has arrived at a school. Three kids come out he collects them and they get in a car. They talk amongst themselves.

Scene 5: (Evening) Jen & her boyfriend are out in the city dicussing the days events. & they go back cuts back to their appartment at night.

Shots of Boston at night - cuts to

Shots of a Manor/ Large House in the Countryside.

Scene 6: (Morning) Guy she bumped into kids are up his sister arrives to help. Tells him to get a nanny because she can't do everything by himself. She also says he should think about spending some time on himself. Its been almost a year maybe he should start dating. He says he doesnt want to.

Scene 7: (Morning) A caller at Jen & boyfriends appartment. Its an older guy with a briefcase. He sits down and explains their next job and says it involves Jen becoming a nanny for a wealthy widower. He show her photographs she recognises him as the person she bumped into on the street yesterday but doesn't say anything. She is reluctant to do the Job and says she doesn't know whether she can pull it off. Her boyfirend encourages her.

CUT - Thats as far as I have got. So what do you guys think??